Public largely blind to battle of budget
Nearly four weeks after it began, California’s multibillion-dollar budget stalemate has caused little or no inconvenience to most of the state’s residents — which might not be a good thing, some political experts say.
Efforts to minimize program disruptions and ease financial hardship can create a largely business-as-usual atmosphere that softens the public’s anger and eases pressure for a quick solution, critics say.
It’s NOT a good thing. As mentioned here and elsewhere, there is no incentive to pass a budget. Republicans are mainly looking to hurt Dem Gray Davis in an election year – and neither they nor the Dems are personally touched by the stalemate. Their staffers are – they aren’t getting paid, but I’m sure they were fully aware of that possibility when they signed on – and as previously noted, legislators continue to receive full per diem. Normally, they would be on break, but instead they’re being paid to NOT reach an agreement.
Connell, the controller, said state office rents, equipment and utility bills will not be paid during the budget standoff. Payments to Medi-Cal providers will be slowed. Local governments won’t receive all the roadway revenue they’re due.
Services to AIDS clinics may be reduced. Rental assistance claims will not be processed. Contracts for interpreters, food delivery, cellular phones, vehicle maintenance and numerous other services could be affected, officials say.
Just little stuff, right? It’s ‘trickle down’ bankruptcy – all those contractors and companies which would receive payment for those services are affected. It (obviously) adversely affects the local economy to have suppliers lose their largest customer for a period of months – every year. And the negative effects from loss of clinic services and rental assistance should be self-evident.
First thing to do is, withhold per diem. Second thing to do, withhold staff support (if they aren’t paid, they don’t work).